Research 36 ILIC2021

The Development and Sustainability of the Concept of the State

Doi:: 10.23918/ilic2021.36

Keywords: State; Power; Sovereignty; Self-determination; Territorial Integrity.

Download the PDF Document

PROCEEDINGS OF 6th INTERNATIONAL LEGAL ISSUES CONFERENCE (ILIC2021)

Faculty of Law/ Tishk International University

Date: 25th November 2021

Venue: Kurdistan Region Erbil

ISBN:978-9922-9036-7-5

_____________________________________________________________________________

Hoshang Dara Hama Ameen
ALecturer at Soran University, Faculty of Law, Political Science and Management; Kurdistan Region of Iraq
Dr. Saeideh Shariati Najafabadi
Associate Professor at Soran University, Faculty of Law, Political Science and Management, Kurdistan Region of Iraq

____________________________________________________________

Abstract: The concept of the state has always been the focus point to those who study politics; this is to an extent that politics has been defined as the study of state. The fact is that, the state still is what mainly shapes the life of individuals within a society and also the way that the international relations are functioning. This, simply, means that the state still is an undeniable and a functioning actor. Beside this sustainability, the state has been developed in terms of both its conceptual meanings and functional tasks. However, it is still almost what it was, as an abstract concept. The present paper studies the concept of the state and examines its development and sustainability. It is about analysing the concept in a way that could be understood as an abstract concept through the history of political philosophy. It, moreover, discusses the state’s elements in more than a perspective as a multi-dimensional and multi-aspect concept. This is to find the contractions and paradoxes in thoughts and practices on the states. The main argument is that the state as a concept is developing its appearances and manifestations, and preserving its essence and its core nature at the same time. The paper would ask several questions, such as: to what extent the contemporary state could be considered as the extension of modern, medieval and ancient ones? What are developments that the state as a concept has experienced and how it could preserve its main essence and always remains as state itself? To address these questions, the study uses qualitative methods of analysis within the framework of political science. It depends on secondary data to analyse related themes from different philosophical, legal and political perspectives. This will be about deconstructing the concept of the state into its component elements to know what state made of; and then to reconstruct them in a different way to know what the real nature of the state is. The research has been structured in a way that its chapters and section be helpful to conduct the methodology and to answer the questions. In doing so, the paper would have a philosophical conceptual framework of the concept of the state. It also analyses the concept from a legal and political perspectives. These all are about analysing the development and sustainability of the concept of the state.

_____________________________________________________________________________

References:

– Anter, A. (2014) Max Weber’s Theory of the Modern State: Origins, structure and Significance. Palgrave Macmillan.
– Barkey, K., & Parikh, S. (1991). Comparative perspectives on the state. Annual Review of Sociology, 17(1), 523-549.
– Barkin, J. S., & Cronin, B. (1994). The state and the nation: changing norms and the rules of sovereignty in international relations. International organization, 48(1), 107-130.
– Bosanquet, B. (1925). The philosophical theory of the state (Vol. 143). Macmillan.
– Deutsch, K. W. (1986). State Functions and the Future of the State. International Political Science Review, 7(2), 209-222.
– Duguit, L. (1917). The law and the state. Harvard Law Review, 31(1), 1-185.
– Gierke, O. (1913). Political theories of the Middle Age. Cambridge University Press.
– Innes, M. (2000). State and Society in the Early Middle Ages: The Middle Rhine Valley, 400–1000 (Vol. 47). Cambridge University Press.
– Jessop, B. (2015). The State: Past, Present, Future. Cambridge: Polity.
– Joffe, A. H. (2018). Defining the State. Enemies and Friends of the State: Ancient Prophecy in Context, 3-23.
– Kantorowicz, H. (1932). The concept of the state. Economica, (35), 1-21.
– Knight, D. B. (1992). Statehood: A politico-geographic and legal perspective. GeoJournal, 28(3), 311-318.
– Kukathas, C. (2014). A Definition of the State. U. Queensland LJ, 33, 357.
– Mijuskovic, O. Z. (2016). Aristotle s concept of the state. SOCRATES, 4(4), 13-20.
– Møller, J. (2018). Medieval roots of the modern state: The conditional effects of geopolitical pressure on early Modern state building. Social Science History, 42(2), 295-316.
– Opello, W. C., & Rosow, S. J. (1999). The nation-state and global order: A historical introduction to contemporary politics (No. 320.1 O6.). Boulder^ eCO CO: Lynne Rienner.
– Sabine, G. H. (1920). The concept of the state as power. The Philosophical Review, 29(4), 301-318.
– Solakoglu, O. (2016). Three different perspectives on the role of the nation-state in today’s globalized world. European Scientific Journal, 1-8.
– Spruyt, H. (2002). The origins, development, and possible decline of the modern state. Annual review of political science, 5(1), 127-149.
– Stirk, P. M., & Schuett, R. (2015). The Concept of the State in International Relations. Edinburgh University Press Ltd.
– Vargas-Hernández, J. G. (2016). The question of changing the concept, role and functions of state. Journal of Humanities, Culture and Social Sciences, 1(02), 7-33.
– Vidmar, J. (2015). The Concept of the State and its Right of Existence. Cambridge International Law Journal, 4(3), 547-565.
– Williams, B. (1998). The Sovereign State in the 21st Century: Some Implications of Economic Globalization and New Technologies for Political Organization. Senior Thesis Projects, 1993-2002. http://trace.tennessee.edu/utk_interstp2/34
– Zacher, M. W. (2001). The territorial integrity norm: International boundaries and the use of force. International Organization, 55(2), 215-250.